醫學實驗室管理知識分享,實驗室認證經驗交流,歡迎大家一同討論!
傳統子宮頸抹片與液態薄層抹片的篩檢效能相同
有一篇發表在10月28日出刊的報告(JAMA. 2009;302(16):1757-1764)認為液態薄層抹片(liquid-based cytology)對早期子宮頸的篩檢效能並沒有比傳統子宮頸抹片(conventional cervical cytology)要好。
該報告是在荷蘭進行的一項大型隨機研究(a large randomized study),共有89,784名婦女(年齡30-60歲)參與子宮頸篩檢計畫,由246家家庭醫師診所執行篩檢工作。其中122家被指定使用液態薄層抹片,共篩檢49,222名婦女;124家被指定使用傳統子宮頸抹片,共篩檢40,562名婦女。篩檢計畫自2004年4月至2006年7月1日共進行二年多。所有參與者再追蹤18個月,至2008年1月31日結束。
檢出率參閱下列二表:
Detection Rates, Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Liquid-Based Cytology vs Pap Test
|
Test |
CIN Grade 1+ |
CIN Grade 2+ |
CIN Grade 3+ |
Carcinoma |
|
Liquid-based cytology | ||||
|
Number of patients (n = 48,941) |
405 |
346 |
253 |
30 |
|
Detection rate (95% CI) |
0.83 (0.75–0.91) |
0.71 (0.63–0.78) |
0.52 (0.45–0.58) |
0.06 |
|
Pap Test | ||||
|
Number of patients (n = 40,047) |
328 |
280 |
190 |
14 |
|
Detection rate (95% CI) |
0.82 (0.74–0.91) |
0.70 (0.62–0.78) |
0.47 (0.41–0.54) |
0.03 |
CIN=cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Detection Rates, Per-Protocol Analysis: Liquid-Based Cytology vs Pap Test
|
Test |
CIN Grade 1+ |
CIN Grade 2+ |
CIN Grade 3+ |
Carcinoma |
|
Liquid-based cytology | ||||
|
Number of patients (n = 45,818) |
382 |
327 |
235 |
27 |
|
Detection rate (95% CI) |
0.83 (0.75–0.92) |
0.71 (0.64–0.80) |
0.51 (0.45–0.58) |
0.06 |
|
Pap Test | ||||
|
Number of patients (n = 38,504) |
312 |
270 |
181 |
13 |
|
Detection rate (95% CI) |
0.81 (0.72–0.90) |
0.70 (0.62–0.79) |
0.47 (0.40–0.54) |
0.03 |
【論文摘要】
Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology With Conventional Cytology for Detection of Cervical Cancer Precursors
A Randomized Controlled Trial
Albertus G. Siebers, MSc; Paul J. J. M. Klinkhamer, MD; Johanna M. M. Grefte, MD, PhD; Leon F. A. G. Massuger, MD, PhD; Judith E. M. Vedder; Angelique Beijers-Broos; Johan Bulten, MD, PhD; Marc Arbyn, MD, MSc, DrTMH
JAMA. 2009;302(16):1757-1764.
Context Liquid-based cytology has been developed as an alternative for conventional cervical cytology. Despite numerous studies and systematic reviews, controversy remains about its diagnostic accuracy.
Objective To assess the performance of liquid-based cytology compared with conventional cytology in terms of detection of histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Design, Setting, and Participants Cluster randomized controlled trial involving 89 784 women aged 30 to 60 years participating in the Dutch cervical screening program at 246 family practices. One hundred twenty-two practices were assigned to use liquid-based cytology and screened 49 222 patients and 124 practices were assigned to use the conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) test and screened 40 562 patients between April 2004 and July 1, 2006. Patients were followed up for 18 months through January 31, 2008.
Intervention Screening for CIN using liquid-based cytology or conventional papanicolaou (Pap) test and the blinded review of all follow-up of screen-positive women (blinded to the type of cytology and the initial result).
Main Outcome Measures Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis of the detection rates of and positive predictive values for histologically verified CIN in both cytology systems. Outcomes are presented as crude and adjusted rate ratios (adjustment for age, urbanization, study site, and period).
Results The adjusted detection rate ratios for CIN grade 1+ was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.19); for CIN grade 2+, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.84-1.20); for CIN grade 3+, 1.05 (95% CI, 0.86-1.29); and for carcinoma, 1.69 (95% CI, 0.96-2.99). The adjusted positive predictive value (PPV) ratios, considered at several cytological cutoffs and for various outcomes of CIN did not differ significantly from unity.
Conclusion This study indicates that liquid-based cytology does not perform better than conventional Pap tests in terms of relative sensitivity and PPV for detection of cervical cancer precursors.
【資料來源】
1. JAMA
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/16/1757?home=
2. Medscape
http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/711852?sssdmh=dm1.553076&src=nldne&uac=43456SG
臺北市政府衛生局新聞稿 發稿單位:健康管理處 發稿日期:98年11月2日 聯絡人:游麗惠處長 聯絡電話:1999分機7115 聯絡行動:0966-601-570   ...《 詳全文 》
PSI公司回收液態的血糖試劑 美國FDA於昨天提醒使用者丟棄4個批號的PSI(Pointe Scientific Inc.)公司的液態血糖試劑(產品型號為G7517),因該4個批號的液態血糖試劑無法達到該公司 ...《 詳全文 》
幹細胞可變成精子或卵子 未來只靠男或女也可生孩子 今日新聞NOWnews 2009/10/29 【記者朱錦華/綜合報導】 著名的《自然》雜誌(Nature)報導,由於醫學技術出現大突破 ...《 詳全文 》
什麼是RiliBÄK? 作者:蔡宗仁 RiliBÄK是德國醫學委員會(BÄK)的指引("Rili"),類似美國的CLIA國家標準,針對醫學實驗室定量檢驗項目的結果提出品質的基本要求(minimum req ...《 詳全文 》
世衛研究 長期用手機 罹腦瘤風險大增 中時電子報 2009/10/25 手機只用在聯絡重要事情,莫使用於聊天。 中國時報【潘勛/綜合報導】 由「世界衛生組織」(WHO)監督、斥資二 ...《 詳全文 》
中榮基因檢測 找出血癌治療法 【聯合報╱記者胡宗鳳 /台中報導】2009.10.23 一名51歲婦人於6年前被診斷為「急性骨髓性白血病」(血癌),並與其他9人都被檢出基因變異情形,但只有 ...《 詳全文 》
MLO提供的CLINICAL & PROFESSIONAL REFERENCE GUIDES MLO(Medical Laboratory Observer) 出版的2009-2010 Clinical Laboratory Reference (CLR)之簡表可在網站下載,請直接點選: ...《 詳全文 》
jack_tai的部落格這裡記錄了[台灣][香港][中國][吉隆坡]各地健康檢查機構/行銷管理/醫療法令/健檢機構等,相關訊息!讓你更加了解健康信息與知識,歡迎您進來了解,因為擁抱健康,才擁有未來! 讓大家活的久!活的好!老的慢! |
臨床檢驗發現的分享站歡迎將臨床所發現新奇、特殊的蟲卵、細胞、結晶分享給大家 |
岳林品質大觀園岳林品質大觀園經過一年半的努力,如今已略具規模,在此期間,因提供「品質學會品質知識社群(QKC)」會友作為研習心得發表園地,無形中豐富了大觀園的內容,有了熱心會友的支持,因而燃起園主擴大與QKC會友共同經營本園的決心,竭誠歡迎各位網友參與QKC活動,並請不吝指教! |
力可科技工程/昶欣企業公司通過國家考試建築物室內裝修合格認證)<力可室內裝修設計工程有限公司>我們採用正確的醫療實驗空間方式符合國內外法規設計(大多數國家級特殊醫療及實驗空間是我們專業規劃完成)且擁有合法的國家考試建築物室內裝修合格認證,依據內政部建築法的規定,其醫療實驗空間及合法建築物室內裝修於後說明或訂閱我們的部落格 |